Best Results Standings for group demogroup

See the bottom of this page for an explanation of this table.

All tiebreakers are included in this analysis up to any tiebreaker based on the final game's score. Complete information on PickHoops tiebreakers can be found here.

7 games remainingMust wins for best finish
Current
rank

(score)
Player
(30 total)
Best
finish

(chance)
Worst
finish

(chance)
Super SixteenExciting EightFinal FewChampion
1 (63)Porter Brady1 (7.8%)13 (3.1%) Texas GeoMas
2 (62)Vince Oldham1 (14.1%)11 (2.3%) Fla.
3 (61)Beverly Anderson1 (15.6%)12 (3.1%) Texas Texas
4 (60)Ray Koehler1 (6.3%)19 (2.3%) UCLA VlnovaUCLA
5 (60)Demo User1 (12.5%)14 (3.1%) UCLA UCLA
6 (59)Tim Richburg2 (6.3%)16 (3.1%) UConn Vlnova
7 (58)Chris Hehman6 (1.6%)18 (3.1%) Texas Memphs UConn Fla.Texas Fla.
8 (58)Jeffrey Moser1 (12.5%)22 (3.1%) LSU LSU
9 (58)Sally Lisenby1 (1.6%)18 (6.3%) LSU Memphs GeoMas Fla.Memphs GeoMas
10 (57)Rob Taylor1 (1.6%)18 (10.2%) Texas Memphs GeoMas VlnovaTexas Texas
11 (57)Ashley Scales1 (12.5%)19 (3.1%) Vlnova Vlnova
12 (56)Gabe Brady1 (5.5%)20 (4.7%) LSU Memphs Vlnova
13 (56)Rick Jarrett4 (3.1%)20 (2.3%) Texas UCLA UConn UCLA
14 (56)Nancy Haynes7 (6.3%)20 (7%) Texas Memphs GeoMas Fla.
15 (55)Mary Beth Taylor11 (3.1%)20 (14.1%) Memphs UConn Fla. Fla.
16 (55)Joe Lisenby1 (10.2%)16 (12.5%) UConn
17 (53)Randy Rowell3 (<1%)19 (3.1%) Texas Memphs UConn VlnovaMemphs VlnovaMemphs
18 (52)Brenda Keith9 (1.6%)22 (1.6%) LSU Memphs UConn Vlnova UConn
19 (51)Bill Smith11 (1.6%)23 (25%) LSU UCLA GeoMas VlnovaLSU Vlnova
20 (51)Grant Whitten15 (3.1%)24 (12.5%) LSU Memphs GeoMas Vlnova GeoMas
21 (50)Anna Pelagos5 (2.3%)27 (6.3%) Memphs UConn Memphs UConnUConn
22 (49)W.D. Gillen8 (1.6%)26 (6.3%) Texas Memphs UConn Fla.Memphs Fla.
23 (49)Valerie Williams18 (6.3%)26 (37.5%) LSU UCLA GeoMas Fla.
24 (48)Bob Tanner20 (6.3%)27 (37.5%) LSU UCLA GeoMas Fla.
25 (47)James Shaw15 (3.1%)27 (12.5%) Texas Memphs GeoMas Fla.Memphs
26 (46)Doug Appleyard21 (3.1%)27 (18.8%) LSU Memphs GeoMas VlnovaLSU
27 (46)Sarah Hammond21 (6.3%)27 (25%) Texas UCLA GeoMas Vlnova
28 (43)Ellen Triplett28 (50%)29 (50%) Fla.
29 (42)Will Bergman28 (50%)29 (50%) Vlnova
30 (37)Camille Cash30 (100%)30 (100%)

What this analysis means

After the second round, there are 16 teams remaining, and 32,768 possible ways the tournament can play out. Each possible way the tournament can play out is called a scenario. PickHoops calculates your finishing position for each of these scenarios. Then we display your best and worst possible finishes on this page.

This analysis is run after every day's games, starting the day the Surviving 16 is decided. It is not run earlier since the number of scenarios increases, well, exponentially! If we were to run the analysis after the first round, we would have to process 2,147,483,648 scenarios (that's over 2 BILLION).

After each round, there are fewer ways the tournament can play out. So you should check back after each day's games to see if your best and worst finishes have been updated.

Explanation of chances

The "chance" percentage in the Best Finish column refers to the number of scenarios where you achieve your best finish versus all possible scenarios. The same applies for the Worst Finish column. This percentage considers all possible remaining tournament outcomes to be equally likely.

The percentages are rounded prior to display. If you notice the Best or Worst percentages for your group do not add up to 100, it is probably due to rounding.

This analysis considers sole possession of a finishing spot to be better than a tie for the same spot. So if you win the pool outright in two scenarios (of eight) and tie for the top spot in one scenario, you will be listed as having a 25% chance of achieving your best finish.

Must wins explanation

As we said before, there are 32,768 playout scenarios after the Scintillating 16 is decided. Let's say you would achieve your best finish in 768 of those scenarios. If Team X wins in a particular round in all 768 of those scenarios, that team and round is listed as one of your "Must wins." You cannot achieve your best finish unless Team X wins that game.

In this example, there are 32,000 remaining scenarios where you do *not* achieve your best finish. In some of these, Team X wins that game. So, even if Team X wins a "Must win" game, you might not achieve your best finish. You must check back after every day's games to see if your best finish and "Must wins" for later rounds have been updated. You might find that you have new "Must wins" not listed before!

If multiple teams and rounds are listed, these teams must win all the games in the listed rounds for you to achieve your best finish.

If the column is blank, you have no "Must wins" for a particular round - yet. A blank column is good to see for today's round. But if you have a blank column listed for a later round, check back after today's round - there might be a "Must win" due to results of today's games.

If "N/A" is listed, the round has already been played, and is not included in "Must wins" analysis.